Leadership Philosophy 2: Leadership Philosophy Alignment Gla

Leadership Philosophy 2 Leadership Philosophy Alignment GlaxoSmithKline

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is a global healthcare company dedicated to innovation in pharmaceuticals, vaccines, and consumer healthcare products. Its organizational culture is driven by core values of patient focus, respect, transparency, and integrity. This paper examines the leadership philosophy of a specific leader within GSK—the medicine supply chain leader—and assesses how this philosophy aligns with the organizational design. It further explores the gaps between leadership philosophy and organizational structure and proposes strategies to bridge these gaps to foster organizational effectiveness and purpose achievement.

The medicine supply chain leader at GSK exemplifies a leadership philosophy rooted in commitment, integrity, goal-setting, credibility, and transformational influence. Bohl (2019) describes such a leadership approach as one characterized by making and fulfilling commitments, demonstrating strong character, and maintaining ethical standards in all transactions. This leader emphasizes the importance of objectives and efficiently leveraging resources to attain organizational goals. The leader’s commitment to transparency and trustworthiness has cultivated credibility among team members and stakeholders, reinforcing their role as a transformational leader (Martin, 2015). Transformational leadership at GSK involves motivating teams beyond their usual efforts, inspiring innovation, and driving change aligned with the organization’s mission to improve health outcomes globally.

The organizational structure at GSK is hierarchal, comprising a CEO at the apex, followed by departmental supervisors overseeing research, development, manufacturing, and other units. This structure facilitates clear authority lines and decision-making channels, conducive to efficient control and accountability. However, such a hierarchy can limit spontaneous decision-making and reduce perception-sharing among employees, which are vital elements for fostering innovation and engagement (Bucolo et al., 2012). The emphasis on top-down decision authority may restrict the flexibility necessary for a leader who advocates for change-oriented, empowering leadership philosophies. Consequently, some disconnects emerge between the leadership philosophy—focused on commitment, integrity, motivation, and vision—and the structural constraints that limit decentralization and employee input.

The leader influences organizational design by advocating for open communication, fostering a positive work environment, and promoting change management skills among teams. This approach enhances fluidity, employee motivation, and a culture receptive to innovation (Bucolo et al., 2012). Still, limited structural flexibility poses barriers to fully implementing transformational strategies. To bridge the gap, GSK needs to develop leadership skills such as strategic planning, change management, employee development, and self-awareness—critical competencies to align leadership philosophy with organizational design. These skills enable leaders to empower teams, facilitate spontaneous decision-making, and promote perception-sharing, thus creating a more adaptive and responsive organizational environment.

Instituting targeted leadership development initiatives aimed at cultivating these skills will help close the gap. Creating a culture that values employee perceptions and encourages proactive engagement can heighten motivation and innovative capacity. Such initiatives include workshops on change management, strategic thinking, emotional intelligence, and inclusive leadership practices. These capacity-building efforts will enable leaders to operate more effectively within the hierarchal structure and advance the organizational purpose of delivering high-quality healthcare products globally.

Paper For Above instruction

Leadership philosophy functions as a guiding framework that shapes a leader’s approach to influence, decision-making, and organizational engagement. In the context of GSK, the leadership philosophy of the medicine supply chain leader embodies core values of commitment, integrity, goal-orientation, and transformational motivation. This philosophical foundation aligns with an organizational aim of innovation and excellence in healthcare delivery, seeking to inspire teams to surpass expectations and foster a culture of continuous improvement (Bohl, 2019).

The leader’s emphasis on making and keeping commitments reflects a deep sense of accountability vital for supply chain management, where reliability and trust are paramount. Upholding integrity enhances credibility, establishes trust among stakeholders, and fosters a moral climate that encourages ethical behavior (Martin, 2015). These attributes are central to transformational leadership, which seeks to motivate followers to realize their full potential and contribute meaningfully to organizational goals. Such a leader motivates teams by inspiring shared vision, promoting high performance, and fostering innovation, aligning with GSK’s strategic focus on scientific advancement and high-quality product development.

The organizational design at GSK features a hierarchical structure that delineates clear roles, responsibilities, and decision-making authority. While this structure supports operational efficiency and accountability, it also imposes constraints on leadership flexibility and spontaneous decision-making. As Bucolo et al. (2012) argue, strict hierarchies can hinder the perception-sharing and agility required for innovative leadership. This disconnect between the leadership philosophy—centered around empowerment, vision, and proactive change—and organizational design highlights a significant challenge. The current structure may limit the leader’s capacity to facilitate spontaneous organizational responses and employee-driven initiatives, which are essential elements of transformative leadership.

Despite structural limitations, the leader influences organizational culture by fostering open communication and creating an environment conducive to creativity and employee engagement. Through effective performance management, leadership development initiatives, and promoting a constructive network within the organization, the leader strives to enhance organizational adaptability and responsiveness (Bucolo et al., 2012). Such efforts, however, need to be complemented by structural adjustments to fully realize the transformative potential of the leadership philosophy.

Bridging the gap between leadership philosophy and organizational design requires targeted efforts in leadership development. It is critical to cultivate skills such as strategic planning, change management, emotional intelligence, and inclusive leadership. These competencies enable leaders to operate more flexibly within hierarchical frameworks, advocate for employee perceptions, and foster an environment where spontaneous decision-making and innovation are normalized. Implementing these initiatives involves structured training programs, mentorship, and organizational policies supporting empowerment and agility.

Creating a culture that values perception, motivation, and proactive change aligns with the transformational leadership style championed by the leader. Such a culture can be nurtured through recognition programs, participative decision-making processes, and continuous learning opportunities. As a result, organizational design and leadership philosophy become more harmonized, promoting sustained organizational growth towards GSK’s overarching mission of improving global health outcomes.

In conclusion, a leader’s philosophy profoundly influences organizational dynamics and performance, particularly in complex, hierarchical structures like GSK. While the existing organizational design supports operational efficiency, it must evolve to accommodate transformational leadership practices. Developing leadership skills focused on change management, strategic orientation, and emotional intelligence can bridge existing gaps, fostering a more adaptable, motivated, and innovative organization poised to meet future healthcare challenges.

References

  • Bohl, K. W. (2019). Leadership as Phenomenon: Reassessing the Philosophical Ground of Leadership Studies. Philosophy of Management, 9(1), 10-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s-x
  • Bucolo, S., Wrigley, C., & Matthews, J. (2012). Gaps in Organizational Leadership: Linking Strategic and Operational Activities through Design-Led Propositions. Design Management Journal, 7(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j..2012.00030.x
  • Martin, J. (2015). Leadership: The Power of Authority. Philosophy of Leadership, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1057/_10
  • Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.
  • Yukl, G. (2019). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson Education.
  • Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Review of Their Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768.
  • Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic Leadership Development: Getting to the Root of Positive Forms of Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338.
  • Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books.
  • House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis? Journal of Management, 23(3), 409-473.

Related Assignments