Motivation Myths: 10 Commonly Believed Myths

Motivation Mythsanshel Identifies 10 Myths That Are Commonly Believed

Motivation Myths Anshel identifies 10 myths that are commonly believed to motivate athletes, but in actuality, they do not. Select any three of these myths and, using the theories of motivation you have read about, provide reasons why these myths are not good practice. If you need additional help, perhaps visualize yourself explaining to a coach why these myths are not grounded in science and support your position with evidence from the theories of motivation with which you are familiar.

Paper For Above instruction

Motivation plays a pivotal role in athletic performance, shaping athletes’ persistence, effort, and overall success. However, several misconceptions or myths about motivation have persisted within sports psychology, often leading to ineffective coaching practices and misguided athlete training programs. Recognizing and dispelling these myths based on scientific theories of motivation is essential for fostering genuine engagement and optimal performance among athletes. This paper critically examines three common motivation myths, analyzing why they are scientifically unfounded and proposing more effective, evidence-based strategies for motivation grounded in established motivational theories.

Myth 1: Motivation Comes Solely from External Rewards

One prevalent myth in sports psychology is that athletes are primarily motivated by external rewards such as trophies, medals, or monetary incentives. While external rewards can temporarily boost motivation, several motivational theories demonstrate that this approach is often inadequate for sustainable motivation. According to Deci and Ryan's Self-Determination Theory (2000), intrinsic motivation—engaging in an activity because it is inherently interesting or enjoyable—is a more powerful and enduring form of motivation than extrinsic rewards. External rewards may undermine intrinsic motivation if they are perceived as controlling, leading to a phenomenon known as the "overjustification effect" (Deci, Koestner, & Ryan, 1999). This effect reduces intrinsic interest in the activity once external incentives are withdrawn, thus impairing long-term motivation. Therefore, relying solely on external rewards is not a sound practice, as it neglects the importance of internal drives and the athlete's autonomy, which are crucial for sustained engagement in sports.

Myth 2: Motivation Can Be Forced or Imposed

This myth suggests that coaches or trainers can simply compel athletes to be motivated through pressure or strict instructions. However, Motivation Theories such as Deci and Ryan’s (2000) Self-Determination Theory emphasize that motivation is most effective when it arises from internal sources—autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Forcing motivation through coercion or overly demanding expectations can backfire, leading to increased anxiety, burnout, and decreased intrinsic motivation. According to the Cognitive Evaluation Theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985), external controls and pressures diminish intrinsic motivation because they threaten the athlete’s sense of autonomy. Athletes who perceive that their motivation is being imposed on them are less likely to develop an internal desire to succeed and more likely to disengage from training. Therefore, motivation cannot be effectively forced; instead, it must be cultivated through supportive environments that satisfy athletes’ psychological needs.

Myth 3: Motivation Is a Constant Trait Within Athletes

The misconception here is that motivation is a fixed characteristic inherent in an athlete, rather than a fluctuating state influenced by external and internal factors. This myth overlooks the dynamic nature of motivation, as described by Vallerand’s (1997) Dualistic Model of Passion and other motivational frameworks. Motivation varies depending on context, task difficulty, mood, and external circumstances. For example, an athlete may feel highly motivated during on-season competitions but less so during off-season training. Recognizing motivation as a variable aligns with the Self-Regulation Theory (Bandura, 1986), which emphasizes that athletes can regulate and enhance their motivation through goal setting, self-efficacy, and feedback. Viewing motivation as a fleeting state rather than a fixed trait encourages coaches and athletes to employ strategies that bolster motivation consistently, such as fostering a sense of mastery and providing meaningful feedback, rather than assuming that motivation is a static trait that merely exists or does not.

Conclusion

Dispelling common motivation myths is critical for developing practices that genuinely foster athlete engagement, resilience, and success. Relying on extrinsic rewards, attempting to force motivation, or viewing motivation as a fixed trait are approaches contradicted by robust motivational theories. Instead, fostering intrinsic motivation through autonomy-supportive environments, recognizing motivation as variable, and emphasizing psychological needs are strategies grounded in science. Coaches and sports psychologists should thus prioritize creating environments that promote self-determination, mastery, and internal drives, leading to more sustainable and thriving athletic pursuits.

References

• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
• Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668.
• Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 271-360). Academic Press.
• Reeve, J. (2015). Understanding motivation and engaging students in learning. Springer.
• Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and engagement: Science-based strategies for enhancing student achievement. Routledge.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
• Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 485-516.
• Maertz, C. P., & Campion, M. A. (2004). Profiles in quitting: An integrative review of statistically derived organizational exit patterns. The Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 684-703.