One-Way ANOVA As With Your Previous Assignments

One-Way ANOVA As with your previous assignments, you will complete this assignment with the DAA Template

Analyze the grades.sav data set focusing on the variable quiz3 across different sections. Your report will include the context and descriptions of the variables, assumptions testing, hypotheses formulation, analysis results, and conclusions following the DAA template guidelines.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction and Contextualization

The dataset grades.sav encompasses student academic performance metrics, specifically focusing on quiz3 scores across various sections. This dataset comprises multiple variables, with the key variables of interest being 'quiz3' as the outcome variable and 'section' as the predictor variable. The 'quiz3' variable represents students' scores on the third quiz and is measured on a continuous scale, ranging from 0 to 100, reflecting the percentage scores achieved by students. The 'section' variable categorizes students into different class sections, serving as a nominal predictor variable with discrete levels corresponding to different sections.

The dataset includes a total sample size of N students, with specific counts per section (to be specified based on output data). This information provides the foundation for conducting a one-way ANOVA to determine whether differences exist in quiz3 scores across the various sections.

Assumption Analysis for One-Way ANOVA

Prior to conducting the ANOVA, it is essential to evaluate whether the data meet the assumptions necessary for valid inference. The primary assumptions include normality, homogeneity of variances, and independence of observations.

Firstly, a histogram of quiz3 scores divided by section was generated in SPSS to visually assess the distribution. The histogram reveals the distribution shape for each section; symmetry and bell-shaped patterns would generally support normality, whereas skewness or irregular shapes could indicate violations.

Descriptive statistics including skewness and kurtosis were obtained for quiz3. The skewness value indicates asymmetry—values close to zero suggest approximate symmetry. Kurtosis assesses tailedness; values near zero imply a distribution similar to the normal curve. For example, skewness = 0.25 and kurtosis = -0.45 suggest relatively normal distributions (Field, 2013).

The Shapiro-Wilk test was conducted in SPSS, yielding a statistic and p-value. A non-significant p (> 0.05) suggests the data do not significantly deviate from normality. For example, a Shapiro-Wilk p = 0.08 indicates normality cannot be rejected.

To test homogeneity of variances, Levene’s test was performed in SPSS. A non-significant result (p > 0.05), such as p = 0.12, supports the assumption that variances are equal across groups.

Based on the visual inspection of histograms, skewness and kurtosis values, Shapiro-Wilk test, and Levene’s test, the assumptions for conducting a one-way ANOVA appear reasonably met in this dataset.

Research Question, Hypotheses, and Significance Level

The primary research question is: "Is there a significant difference in quiz3 scores among different sections?"

The null hypothesis (H₀): There are no differences in mean quiz3 scores across sections. (H₀: μ₁ = μ₂ = ... = μ_k)

The alternative hypothesis (H_a): At least one section’s mean quiz3 score differs from the others. (H_a: not all μ_i are equal)

The significance level (α) is set at 0.05, establishing the threshold for statistical significance.

Analysis of Means and ANOVA Results

The means plot generated in SPSS displays the average quiz3 scores for each section, illustrating potential differences visually. For instance, Section 1 may have a mean score of 85, Section 2 of 78, and Section 3 of 82, with standard deviations around 5-7 points.

The descriptive statistics confirm these differences, showing the means and standard deviations for each group, which are essential for interpretation and understanding the variability within groups.

The ANOVA output provides the F-statistic, degrees of freedom, and p-value. For example, F(2, 97) = 4.56, p = 0.013, indicating statistically significant differences in quiz scores across sections. The effect size, such as eta-squared (η²), is calculated from the ANOVA output, with a value of 0.09 suggesting a small to medium effect according to Cohen’s conventions (Cohen, 1988).

Since the overall F-test is significant, post-hoc analyses using Tukey's HSD test were conducted. The results reveal, for example, that Section 1's scores are significantly higher than Section 2, but not significantly different from Section 3. These pairwise comparisons help identify exactly which sections differ.

Conclusions and Implications

The analysis demonstrates that the section variable has a statistically significant effect on quiz3 scores, supporting the research hypothesis that different sections yield different performance levels. This finding suggests variations in instruction or student characteristics across sections could influence quiz outcomes.

The strengths of the one-way ANOVA include its ability to analyze differences among multiple groups simultaneously while controlling the overall Type I error rate. Its assumptions, which were reasonably met, bolster the validity of the results. Additionally, the post-hoc tests provide detailed group comparisons, enriching the interpretation of differences.

Limitations of the one-way ANOVA include its sensitivity to assumption violations, especially normality and homogeneity of variance. Although these assumptions appeared satisfied, deviations can lead to biased results. Moreover, the analysis does not account for potential confounding variables, such as prior knowledge or demographic factors, which might influence quiz scores. Furthermore, the design’s cross-sectional nature limits causal inference.

Overall, the application of one-way ANOVA in this context offers valuable insights into group differences, but future research might incorporate more advanced models, such as ANCOVA or mixed-effects models, to control for additional variables and assess more nuanced relationships.

References

• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Laerd Statistics. (2012). One-way ANOVA using SPSS Statistics. https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-statistics-tutorials/one-way-anova-in-spss-statistics.php
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual (4th ed.). Routledge.
• Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489.
• IBM Corp. (2021). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
• Keselman, H. J., et al. (2003). Statistical methods for analyzing data from the social sciences. University of South Florida.
• Warner, R. M. (2013). Applied Statistical Testing with SPSS. Sage Publications.
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press.