Purpose The Process For Affecting Positive Change To Improve ✓ Solved

Purposethe Process For Affecting Positive Change To Improve Practice O

Purposes the process for affecting positive change to improve practice outcomes can start with either the identification of an area of interest or the identification of a potential or existing practice problem. Selecting an area of interest helps to define a direction for further inquiry. The purpose of this assessment is for students to identify and discuss an area of interest specific to advanced practice nursing. Students will identify a common practice problem related to the selected area of interest and provide a recommendation to affect positive change. Students will build on this project in later courses.

Note: The purpose of the MSN project is to translate evidence currently found in the literature into practice within the chosen specialty track. Due to the research complexity, time involvement, and implications regarding human subjects, drug studies are not acceptable areas of interest for an MSN project.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The process of effecting positive change within advanced practice nursing is a vital component of ensuring high-quality patient care and improving overall healthcare outcomes. This paper explores the systematic approach to identifying practice-related problems, developing evidence-based interventions, and implementing change within nursing practice. Key concepts include the importance of selecting appropriate practice areas, utilizing conceptual models to guide project development, and understanding the factors that influence change. The presentation will address the significance of evidence-based practice, explore conceptual frameworks such as the ARCC model, and outline practical steps for nurse practitioners to effect meaningful improvements in their clinical settings.

Importance of Evidence-Based Projects in Nursing Practice

Master's-prepared nurses play a crucial role in leading evidence-based projects that directly influence patient outcomes and advance the nursing profession. Engaging in these projects fosters a culture of continuous improvement, critical thinking, and scholarly inquiry, which are essential to practicing safely and effectively within complex healthcare systems (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Evidence-based practice (EBP) enables nurses to integrate the best available research findings with clinical expertise and patient preferences, thus promoting personalized and effective care. Furthermore, active participation in EBP enhances the credibility of nursing as a scientific discipline and supports professional development (Stevens, 2013). As healthcare challenges grow increasingly complex, the reliance on EBP becomes indispensable for implementing innovative solutions and improving health outcomes systematically.

Conceptual Model for Evidence-Based Practice

A widely used conceptual framework for developing EBP projects is the Advancing Research and Clinical Practice through Close Collaboration (ARCC) Model (Melnyk et al., 2012). This model emphasizes the importance of collaboration among clinicians, researchers, and administrators to foster a culture of inquiry and change. The ARCC model comprises five core elements: (1) organizational culture and leadership, (2) capacity for EBP, (3) EBP mentors, (4) EBP teams, and (5) practice change.

In applying this model, nurse practitioners can assess organizational readiness, assemble multidisciplinary teams, and identify clinical questions driven by practice problems (Melnyk et al., 2012). The model encourages ongoing education and mentoring to foster EBP competence among staff, which ultimately facilitates the successful integration of evidence into practice. Support from scholarly sources indicates that the ARCC model effectively guides EBP implementation by addressing barriers and leveraging facilitators within healthcare organizations (Wang et al., 2019).

Area of Interest and Current Knowledge

The chosen area of interest is increasing influenza vaccination rates among adult patients in primary care settings. Despite established guidelines and evidence supporting vaccination efficacy, vaccination rates remain suboptimal, especially among vulnerable populations such as the elderly, minorities, and those with co-morbidities (Kempton et al., 2018). Current literature indicates that multiple factors influence vaccination uptake, including patient beliefs, healthcare provider recommendations, access, and systemic barriers (Lu et al., 2020).

The importance of enhancing influenza vaccination rates is underscored by the significant morbidity and mortality associated with seasonal influenza infections. Nurse practitioners, as frontline providers, have a pivotal role in advocating for vaccination and educating patients. The rationales behind focusing on this issue include reducing hospitalizations, preventing complications, and decreasing healthcare costs during influenza seasons (CDC, 2021). Therefore, understanding the determinants of vaccination behaviors can inform targeted interventions to improve coverage.

Issue/Concern and Practice Change Recommendation

The specific concern within this area is the persistent low vaccination rates among high-risk adult populations. A recommended practice change is implementing a standardized, evidence-based vaccination promotion protocol during patient encounters, incorporating motivational interviewing techniques and tailored educational materials. The rationale is that personalized communication and provider endorsement significantly influence patient decision-making regarding immunizations (Namoll et al., 2021).

Supporting this change with evidence, a randomized controlled trial demonstrated that enhanced provider communication increased influenza vaccination acceptance among hesitant adults (Zimmerman et al., 2019). Therefore, integrating structured vaccination promotion strategies into routine practice can effectively address vaccine hesitancy and improve immunization rates, ultimately reducing influenza-related complications.

Factors Influencing Change

Two internal factors that could influence the implementation of this practice change include organizational support and staff training. Internal support from leadership can facilitate resource allocation and prioritize vaccination efforts. Additionally, staff training in motivational interviewing and communication skills enhances confidence and effectiveness in engaging patients.

External factors encompass healthcare policy and reimbursement incentives. Policies that promote vaccination documentation and reporting can motivate providers to adhere to vaccination protocols. Contrarily, external barriers such as staffing shortages or high patient volume may impede consistent application of the intervention. Understanding these dynamics is essential for planning sustainable implementation. Literature supports that organizational readiness and external policy frameworks significantly impact EBP adoption (Davis et al., 2020).

NONPF Competencies Related to EBP Project

The first competency pertains to Leadership and Systems Thinking, which involves understanding organizational dynamics and fostering a culture receptive to change (Nonpf, 2013). This is relevant as the nurse practitioner's leadership influences the adoption of vaccination protocols. The second competency relates to Developing and Maintaining Collaborative Partnerships, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to support practice improvements. These competencies enable nurse practitioners to effect change effectively within their practice environments, aligning with the principles of evidence-based practice and quality improvement (Kleinpell et al., 2018).

Conclusion

Effecting positive change in nursing practice requires a strategic, evidence-based approach that involves identifying practice gaps, selecting appropriate conceptual models, and considering internal and external factors. The focus on increasing influenza vaccination rates illustrates how nurse practitioners can lead targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes. Utilizing frameworks like the ARCC model fosters organizational readiness and staff engagement, facilitating sustainable practice improvements. Emphasizing the integration of evidence with clinical judgment and interdisciplinary collaboration is paramount to advancing healthcare quality. Ultimately, nurse practitioners serve as catalysts for change, promoting a culture of continuous improvement grounded in evidence and collaborative effort.

References

Davis, A. J., Stevens, J., & Harris, B. (2020). Organizational factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation. Journal of Nursing Administration, 50(4), 189-194.

Kleinpell, R., Karl, K. R., & Rudolph, K. (2018). Leadership competencies for advanced practice registered nurses. Nursing Outlook, 66(2), 110-115.

Kempton, E., Merson, L., & Chauvin, S. (2018). Influenza vaccination coverage among high-risk adults. Vaccine, 36(3), 393-398.

Kleinpell, R., Boyer, J., & Pogorzelska-Maziarz, M. (2018). Developing leadership competencies for nurses. American Journal of Nursing, 118(9), 62-69.

Lu, P., Hsieh, Y.-H., & Lin, S.-Y. (2020). Factors influencing influenza vaccination among adults. Vaccine, 38(18), 3672-3678.

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Wolters Kluwer.

Melnyk, B. M., Pedersen, S. C., & Rothrich, J. A. (2012). The ARCC Model of organizational readiness for evidence-based practice change. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 13(3), 129-137.

National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF). (2013). Nurse Practitioner Core Competencies Content. https://www.nonpf.org

Stevens, K. R. (2013). The role of evidence-based practice in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 3(4), 16-21.

Wang, J., McGinnis, M., & McGinnis, S. (2019). Applying the ARCC model to improve clinical practice. Journal of Professional Nursing, 35(4), 287-294.

Zimmerman, L., Williams, S., & Johnson, P. (2019). Enhancing influenza vaccination through provider communication. Vaccine, 37(14), 1903-1907.