Running Head Journal 3 Journal Jail Ya Wooden Walden Univers

Running Head Journal3journaljailya Woodenwalden Universityrsch 8360de

Since the previous entry, we have explored the evidence-based practice implementation process. “, we discussed the importance of conducting research, gathering relevant research results into actionable products, collaborating with expert opinion leaders and healthcare institutions, and transferring knowledge to end-users for adoption and implementation. We also discussed potential obstacles to adopting the evidence-based practice, such as a lack of understanding and ability to use study findings as evidence, poor time management, a lack of desire, resources, and inadequate training. We discussed ensuring that CBGT sessions are consistently held for patients suffering from a major depressive disorder.

I have faced a few challenges concerning the course and developing my research question and approach for my Final Project. For instance, one major challenge I have faced is ensuring that my research question is clearly defined and focused. It is essential to ensure that the research question is specific and that the research results are meaningful and applicable to the problem I am studying. Another challenge has been finding the right resources to use for my research. It is essential to ensure that the resources I use are reliable and up-to-date to ensure my research's accuracy and validity.

Finally, I have found it challenging to keep up with the course material and ensure I am sufficiently prepared for each lesson. The next challenge I am considering is developing a comprehensive research methodology appropriate for my research question. It is crucial to consider the scope of the research, the type of data collected, and the methods used to analyze the data (Johnson et al., 2020). I am also considering how my research project is evolving and which additional resources I need to consult to ensure the research is comprehensive and accurate. Finally, I am considering how to ensure that I stay on track and meet the deadlines for the project.

Paper For Above instruction

Developing an effective research methodology and refining the research question are critical components in the successful execution of health research projects. The complexities in healthcare research necessitate a structured approach that ensures data validity, reliability, and applicability to clinical practice. This paper discusses the challenges faced in formulating a focused research question, selecting appropriate resources, and designing a robust methodology, along with strategies to overcome these obstacles.

Formulating a clear and focused research question is foundational to any scholarly investigation. A well-defined question guides the entire research process, from data collection to analysis, and ultimately determines the relevance of findings. One common challenge is avoiding scope drift—where the question becomes too broad or vague—making it difficult to produce actionable results. To mitigate this, researchers should engage in thorough preliminary reviews of existing literature, identify gaps, and refine their questions iteratively. Incorporating frameworks like PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) can further enhance clarity by delineating what the study intends to examine (Higgins et al., 2019).

Another challenge is resource selection. The credibility and currency of resources significantly impact the quality of research outcomes. Researchers must navigate an abundance of information, discerning peer-reviewed journal articles, reputable databases, and authoritative sources from less reliable materials. Utilizing verified academic databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science can facilitate access to high-quality publications. Additionally, establishing criteria for resource assessment—such as publication date, peer-review status, and author credentials—helps ensure reliability and validity (Torraco, 2016).

Designing a comprehensive research methodology demands careful consideration of several factors, including the choice of qualitative or quantitative approaches, sample size, data collection tools, and analysis techniques. Quantitative methods, such as randomized controlled trials or surveys, enable statistical inference, whereas qualitative approaches, like interviews or focus groups, provide contextual insights. Balancing these methods, known as mixed-methods research, often yields a more holistic understanding of healthcare phenomena. When developing a methodology, it is essential to align it with the research questions and ensure ethical considerations are addressed, including informed consent and confidentiality (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2018).

Furthermore, the evolving nature of research projects requires ongoing resource consultation and flexibility. Researchers should establish a timeline with milestones, allocate sufficient time for data analysis, and remain adaptable to unforeseen challenges. Regularly reviewing progress against objectives helps maintain focus and momentum. Mentorship and peer consultation are also invaluable strategies for refining methodology and ensuring rigor, particularly for novice researchers.

In summary, overcoming the challenges of formulating a precise research question, selecting trustworthy resources, and designing a suitable methodology involves deliberate planning, critical appraisal skills, and adaptability. Emphasizing these aspects enhances research quality and contributes to evidence-based practice improvements in healthcare. As Johnson et al. (2020) emphasize, rigor in qualitative research hinges on transparent processes and methodological coherence, which are essential for generating valid and impactful findings.

References

• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., & Chandler, J. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons.
• Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. (2020). A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1).
• Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404-421.