Strayerbus 475 Business And Society Course Description

Strayerbus 475 Business And Societycourse Descriptionthis Course Exp

This course explores the role of primary and secondary stakeholders, both within and outside organizations. Ethics and social responsibility will be investigated and where organizational activities fall within different continuums will be reviewed. The broad forces in business, society, and globalization will be examined and how stakeholders can influence the destiny of both business and society will be discussed.

Paper For Above instruction

In this paper, I will analyze the social performance of De Beers Diamond Company, a globally recognized leader in the diamond industry. I will explore its organizational structure, product offerings, external environmental factors impacting its success, key stakeholders, their influence on the company's financial performance, a notable corporate social responsibility concern, strategies to build stakeholder coalitions, potential challenges therein, and recommend steps to address these issues.

Organization Overview, External Environment, and Key Factors

De Beers is a multinational corporation primarily involved in the exploration, diamond mining, trading, and retailing sector. It holds a dominant position in the global diamond industry, historically controlling a significant share of the world's diamond supply. The company's organizational structure is corporate, with centralized decision-making processes that oversee various regional operations. It offers various products, primarily raw and polished diamonds, catering to jewelry manufacturers, retailers, and private consumers. Its core business involves sourcing diamonds from mines across Africa, Canada, and Australia, and distributing them worldwide.

Two critical external environmental factors influencing De Beers include geopolitical stability and market demand fluctuations. Geopolitical stability in diamond-producing regions, such as Africa, directly impacts the company's supply chain—conflicts or political unrest can disrupt operations or lead to ethical concerns about sourcing practices. Additionally, global economic conditions affect consumer demand for luxury goods like diamonds, influencing sales and profitability.

For example, during economic downturns, discretionary spending declines, leading to reduced demand for diamonds, thereby impacting revenues. Conversely, economic growth fosters increased consumer confidence and spending on luxury items, potentially boosting De Beers' sales. Understanding these external factors is essential for strategic planning and maintaining competitive advantage.

Salient Stakeholders and Their Roles

De Beers' key stakeholders include suppliers (diamond miners), customers (jewelers and consumers), and regulatory bodies. Diamond miners play a crucial role by providing the raw materials necessary for De Beers’ operations; their relationship is governed by supply contracts and ethical sourcing standards. Customers demand high-quality diamonds and influence product offerings, marketing strategies, and brand reputation. Regulatory agencies oversee compliance with international trade laws, environmental standards, and ethical sourcing policies, ensuring accountability and social responsibility.

The company also engages with local communities around its mining regions, as stakeholders concerned with social and environmental impacts. These relationships affect public perception and operational licenses. Maintaining positive stakeholder relationships is vital for sustainability and long-term success.

Influence of Primary Stakeholders on Financial Performance

Primarily, stakeholders can influence De Beers' financial outcomes through several means:

  1. Supply Continuity: Miners' commitment guarantees a steady flow of diamonds, essential for meeting market demand and revenue stability.
  2. Market Demand: Consumer preferences and trust affect sales volumes; brand reputation can drive premium pricing and customer loyalty.
  3. Operational Costs: Efficient stakeholder management reduces costs associated with sourcing, ethical compliance, and logistics.
  4. Regulatory Compliance: Adherence to legal standards avoids fines, sanctions, or reputational damage that could negatively impact profits.
  5. Innovation and Product Differentiation: Stakeholder feedback can lead to the development of new products, attracting diverse markets and increasing revenues.

Supporting these points, studies highlight that stakeholder engagement enhances corporate financial performance by fostering trust, reducing risks, and opening new market opportunities (Clarkson, 1995; Freeman, 1984).

Controversial CSR Concern

The most prominent CSR controversy associated with De Beers is its historical role in funding conflict and unethical sourcing practices, which have been linked to "blood diamonds." Although the company has initiatives aimed at ethical sourcing, critics argue that illegal or unethical mining persists, raising questions about its social responsibility commitments and transparency in supply chain practices.

Stakeholder Coalition Formation Plan

As a leader of consumer advocacy groups, my plan to form a coalition involves several steps:

  • Identifying Members: Engage NGOs, ethical investors, and consumers committed to ethical sourcing to form a diverse coalition.
  • Target Group Rationale: Consumers and NGOs are influential because their purchasing power and advocacy pressure can compel De Beers to adopt more rigorous ethical standards.
  • Fostering Collaboration: Hold joint campaigns, utilize social media to raise awareness, and organize stakeholder forums that promote transparency and shared goals.

This coalition aims to leverage shared values to influence corporate behavior, emphasizing ethical sourcing as a key to brand reputation and consumer trust.

Challenges and Overcoming Strategies

The potential challenges include stakeholder apathy, conflicting interests, and resistance from industry insiders fearing economic impacts. To overcome these, I propose:

  1. Raising awareness through targeted education campaigns that highlight the benefits of ethical practices for long-term profitability.
  2. Creating incentive-based collaborations, such as certifications, to align stakeholder interests.
  3. Building trust via transparent communication and gradual implementation of ethical standards to reduce resistance.

These steps are justified because they address roots of conflict, foster mutual benefits, and align stakeholders toward common ethical objectives, therefore enhancing coalition cohesion and effectiveness (Freeman, 1984; Yoon et al., 2010).

References

  • Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
  • De Beers Group. (2023). About us. https://www.debeersgroup.com/about-us
  • Human Rights Watch. (2020). Blood and Diamonds: The ethical dilemmas in the diamond industry. https://www.hrw.org/report/2020/07/15/blood-and-diamonds
  • Kapstein, E. B. (2013). The business of blood: The diamond industry and conflict. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 251–262.
  • Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Chen, Y. (2010). Moral intensity and ethical decision making: The influence of stakeholder salience. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 231-246.
  • DDAC. (2021). Ethical Sourcing and Conflict-Free Diamonds. Diamond Development and Certification. https://ddac.org/ethical-sourcing
  • World Diamond Council. (2022). Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS). https://www.kimberleyprocess.com
  • McMahon, G., & Harris, L. (2019). Ethical branding and corporate social responsibility in the diamond industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(1), 123–136.
  • Whitney, P. (2021). Corporate transparency and ethical sourcing: The case of De Beers. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(2), 255-274.

Related Assignments