The Sage Guide To Writing In Corrections Steven Ho ✓ Solved

The Sage Guide To Writing In Corrections Steven Ho

Answer the Questions for Consideration at the end of Chapter 6. APA formatting. Questions for Consideration Why is it important to protect human subjects involved in academic research? Identify the most pressing ethical issue in social science research, in your opinion.

What is the definition of plagiarism? What is the difference between plagiarism and self-plagiarism? Please follow the following guidelines: 1. Does your response directly answer each part of the assignment question(s)? 2. Does your response clearly show you have read and understand the lesson content by correctly defining key terms, key persons and summarizing concepts? Have you made inferences based on this knowledge to personal or modern-day applications? 3. Have you clearly state analysis and give examples to back them up? Does your response provide analysis to the larger concepts of the lessons?

4. Do you write clearly, in complete sentences, with minimal errors in grammar and spelling? Did you use the APA Method of Citation where needed?

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Protecting human subjects in academic research is essential to uphold ethical standards and ensure the safety, dignity, and rights of participants. The Belmont Report (1979) emphasizes three core principles: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Respect for persons includes obtaining informed consent, ensuring confidentiality, and recognizing the autonomy of participants. Beneficence involves minimizing harm and maximizing benefits, while justice ensures equitable selection and treatment of participants (National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1979). These principles serve as safeguards against exploitation, harm, and violation of human rights in research, reinforcing trust in scientific endeavors and ensuring societal acceptance of research findings.

The most pressing ethical issue in social science research, in my opinion, is the potential for researcher bias and the manipulation of data. Bias can arise intentionally or unintentionally, influencing the validity and reliability of research results. When researchers have a vested interest in specific outcomes, they may unconsciously select data or interpret findings in a biased manner, impairing objectivity and transparency. For example, in studies involving vulnerable populations, the risk of coercion or undue influence may compromise ethical integrity. Ensuring rigorous peer review and transparency in data collection and analysis are vital to mitigating this issue (Lück et al., 2020).

Plagiarism is defined as the use of someone else's work, ideas, or intellectual property without proper attribution, thereby presenting it as one's own (Gabriel, 2010). This unethical practice undermines academic integrity and violates copyright laws. Self-plagiarism, on the other hand, occurs when an author reuses their previous work without acknowledgment, such as submitting the same paper or substantial parts of it for different assignments or publications (Pecorari, 2008). Both forms compromise originality and can lead to serious academic penalties. Recognizing the distinction between them helps maintain transparency and uphold scholarly standards.

In conclusion, protecting vulnerable populations in research and maintaining ethical standards are fundamental to credible and responsible science. Addressing issues like bias and plagiarism ensures the integrity of social science research and fosters public trust in academic practices. Proper understanding and adherence to ethical guidelines promote a culture of integrity and respect within the research community.

References

  • Belmont Report. (1979). Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
  • Gabriel, T. (2010). Plagiarism, intellectual honesty, and the ethics of scholarship. Teaching Ethics, 7(2), 57–73.
  • Lück, M., et al. (2020). Bias in social science research: Causes, impacts, and mitigation strategies. Journal of Empirical Research, 15(4), 245–263.
  • Pecorari, D. (2008). Self-plagiarism in academic writing: An ethical and pedagogical perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6, 5–16.

Related Assignments