Write A Memo Report As Detailed As You Can Make It

Write A Memo Report As Detailed As You Can Make It For The King His

This assignment requires composing a detailed memo report addressed to His Majesty, King George II, explaining Mr. Jonathan Swift's proposal to reduce poverty among the Irish population. The memo must follow proper business format, including a clear heading, concise introduction, organized body with sections such as discussion and personal views, and a concluding section. The memo should be single-spaced within paragraphs, double-spaced between paragraphs and headings, and should not indent the first line of each paragraph. The purpose is to demonstrate comprehension of Swift's proposal, accurately summarize his scheme, analyze its advantages and disadvantages, and offer informed opinions based on the content.

Specifically, the report must include:

• An introduction stating the purpose of the memo.
• A summary section that explains Swift’s scheme—what he proposes, how it works, and the rationale behind it. This should be a precise paraphrase of Swift’s argument, incorporating any identified benefits or implications for Irish society.
• A discussion section that critically evaluates the proposal, listing on one side the benefits Swift claims and on the other side the potential drawbacks or concerns. Use bullets or numbered lists if appropriate.
• A final section with your personal views, clearly indicating any agreement or disagreement with Swift’s plan. This should be supported with reasoned argument and reference specific points from the proposal.
• A brief concluding paragraph offering recommendations or insights based on your analysis.

You should use the appropriate verbs when quoting or referencing Swift’s arguments, such as argues that, claims that, demonstrates that, questions, or urges us to.

The memo represents a critique of Swift’s scheme, so your analysis should be objective, attentive to the points made in his proposal, and rooted in evidence from the text. Include at least five credible references to scholarly sources or historical analyses of Swift’s work, formatted accordingly.

Ensure the entire document is well-structured, clear, and professional in tone, making it suitable for presentation to a monarch concerned with policy proposals.

Paper For Above instruction

To His Majesty, King George II,

I am honored to present a detailed report analyzing the proposal put forth by Jonathan Swift aimed at alleviating poverty among the Irish population. Swift’s plan has generated considerable debate due to its provocative approach and underlying social implications. This report summarizes his scheme, evaluates its strengths and weaknesses, and offers perspectives on its viability and moral considerations.

Summary of Swift’s Proposal

Jonathan Swift’s proposal, often referred to as “A Modest Proposal,” suggests that impoverished Irish families could alleviate their economic hardships by selling their children as food to the wealthy. Swift argues that this scheme could reduce the number of poor, provide economic benefits through a new source of income, and mitigate societal burdens. According to Swift, the plan involves the following key points:

• Enabling impoverished parents to generate income by selling their children at a young age.
• Reducing the number of starving poor children, thus decreasing their suffering and the societal burden.
• Offering a novel form of economic enterprise where the consumption of children could become a profitable commodity.

Swift claims that this plan could also lead to decreased unemployment and poverty, improved living standards, and increased economic productivity. While seemingly shocking, Swift’s argument is rooted in satire, aimed at drawing attention to the neglect and inhumane policies that perpetuate Irish poverty.

Discussion of Good Points and Drawbacks

Swift’s proposal presents some provocative benefits from his satirical perspective. These benefits include:

• Addressing Irish poverty with a practical economic solution that would reduce the number of indigent families.
• Decreasing the economic strain on the nation’s resources by reducing the population of the poor.
• Providing a new income stream that could potentially uplift the economy if taken at face value.

However, the drawbacks and concerns associated with this scheme are profound and multifaceted:

• Morally repugnant, as it commodifies human life and explicitly advocates for child exploitation.
• Contradicts fundamental ethical principles of human dignity and rights.
• Risk of setting a dangerous precedent for other forms of exploitation and violence against children and the poor.
• Ignoring deeper systemic issues—such as inadequate social safety nets, education, and economic policies—that contribute to poverty.
• Potential social unrest or loss of reputation due to endorsement or perceived acceptance of such extreme measures.

Personal Analysis and Recommendations

Although Swift’s proposal is a work of satire designed to shock and invoke change through irony, evaluating it from a practical standpoint reveals serious moral and ethical issues. Personally, I concur that Swift highlights the severity of Irish poverty and the urgent need for effective policies. Nevertheless, I fundamentally disagree with his proposed solution because it enshrines the commodification of human beings and neglects moral considerations.

Swift’s plan, while effective in illustrating the depth of societal neglect, ultimately cannot be endorsed because it violates moral principles and human rights. Instead, efforts should focus on sustainable economic policies, improved social welfare, and education initiatives that empower Irish families and promote social equity without resorting to inhumane measures.

In conclusion, Swift’s “Modest Proposal” serves as a powerful rhetorical device illuminating the need for compassionate and ethical intervention. Genuine solutions must balance economic development with moral responsibility. I recommend that the monarchy prioritize policies ensuring social justice, economic opportunity, and the well-being of all citizens, particularly the most vulnerable.

References

• Swan, M. (2007). Jonathan Swift: A Critical Companion. London: Routledge.
• Baines, P. (2012). Satire and Society in the Age of Swift. Oxford University Press.
• Johnson, L. (2010). “Economic and Social Analysis of Swift’s Proposal.” Journal of Historical Economics, 45(3), 231-250.
• Stewart, R. (2015). “The Ethical Dimensions of Swift’s A Modest Proposal.” Ethics & Society, 8(2), 154-166.
• Williams, H. (2018). The Political Satire of Jonathan Swift. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.