Answer Is Required From A 100% Positive Feedback Member

Answer Is Required From A 100 Positive Feedbackmember And Withinfou

Answer is required from a 100+ positive feedback member and within four hours. I need ALL Question Answered (not a two sentence answer) NO PLAGARISM, must be original!, and this question: Elaborate on two key learnings from the case related to training and development and its integration with the organization. Be sure to clearly state the two key learnings and defend them in well-organized, scholarly responses. C ase 8.2 Customer-Driven HR Costs and Benefits: Assessing the Business Case for Training No matter what your business, to stay in business you have to attract and retain customers. How do you do that? One way is to deliver a quality product or service in a high-quality way. In other words, it is a combination of what is offered and how it is offered that determines if a buyer will become a loyal customer. Training is one way to make sure that employees’ technical skills and customer-service skills meet customer expectations. When making a business decision, two basic elements are typically considered: costs and benefits. In the case of training, the issues are: (1) how much does the training reduce costs? and (2) how much does the training increase revenue? If the training sufficiently reduces costs and/or increases revenues, there is a strong business case to conduct the training. Your ability to identify the potential sources of revenue and costs and to estimate their levels can be an important business skill. It can be the basis by which you can successfully make the case for needed training for your employees. Critical Thinking Questions 1. As you have read, training can increase revenue. The revenue could come from increased quality of the customer experience due to the impact of training. Consider, as an example, the table of customer survey responses before and after training shown on the next page. The numbers are percentages of customers in each satisfaction category six months before and six months after employees received their training. A key change is a reduction in the “Very dissatisfied—will never return” category of customers, which fell from 15 to 5 percent. What will this 10-percent change mean to the bottom line? Customer Satisfaction Very Dissatisfied— will never return Before Training After 5 Training OK, but would return Satisfied— would return Assume that the average revenue generated per month by a customer is $500.00. Also assume that you have 500 customers. What is the increased revenue due to the training for the past six months? What would be the revenue generated if you had 1,000 customers? 2. Training can also impact the bottom line by reducing a number of direct costs. For example, employee costs may be reduced because fewer overtime hours will be needed because of improved performance. Another cost reduction can be seen in reduced returns, because training may reduce errors or damage that can occur when the product or service is provided. Make assumptions about the costs in each of these categories and any other direct costs you can think of. Also assume that you can expect a 10-percent reduction in each of these categories. Generate the direct cost savings estimate due to the training. 3. Training can also impact the bottom line by reducing indirect costs. These are costs that may not be obvious, but that are still important. For example, safety of work processes or equipment can be improved due to training if workers handle materials or equipment more safely. Employee turnover can also be reduced, because of improved job satisfaction due to the training. Assume that training results in a 10-percent reduction in your turnover rate. Also, assume that the cost of a turnover is 1.5 times the departing employee’s salary. For a given average employee salary of your choosing, estimate the reduced costs due to the reduction in turnover. 4. Given your answers to the previous questions, estimate the combined impact of direct and indirect savings generated by training on the bottom line. Extrapolate this number over a one- or two-year time period.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective training and development are vital components of a strategic organizational framework, especially in industries that prioritize customer service and operational efficiency. The integration of training within organizational processes not only enhances employees’ skills but also aligns workforce capabilities with business goals, thereby fostering sustainable growth and competitive advantage. From the case analysis, two key learnings emerge regarding how organizations leverage training to improve performance and their bottom line: the significance of targeted training to improve customer satisfaction and loyalty, and the importance of quantifying training benefits through cost savings and revenue increases.

Key Learning 1: The Role of Targeted Training in Enhancing Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty

One fundamental learning from the case is that targeted training initiatives directly influence customer satisfaction, which in turn impacts customer loyalty and lifetime value. The case study highlights that after employees undergo training, there is a notable decrease in the percentage of 'Very Dissatisfied—Will Never Return' customers, dropping from 15% to 5%. This significant reduction demonstrates that well-designed training enhances employees’ technical skills and service orientation, resulting in better customer interactions. The relationship between improved training and customer satisfaction is further substantiated by the correlation between higher satisfaction levels and increased revenue generation. The case emphasizes that the revenue impact of training can be quantitatively estimated by analyzing customer retention and willingness to continue patronizing the business.

From a scholarly perspective, this aligns with the Service-Profit Chain theory, which posits that internal service quality (achieved through effective training) influences employee satisfaction, which enhances service quality and customer satisfaction, ultimately increasing profitability (Heskett et al., 1994). Therefore, organizations that invest in focused training respond to the critical need for aligning employee skills with evolving customer expectations. Properly trained employees provide superior service, reduce dissatisfaction, and foster customer loyalty—positive outcomes that are directly linked to increased revenue streams.

Furthermore, empirical evidence supports the direct connection between training and customer satisfaction. For example, a study by Bowen and Ford (2000) found that comprehensive service training programs significantly improve service quality and customer perceptions. This demonstrates the strategic importance of integrating training programs specifically designed to enhance interpersonal skills and technical prowess relevant to customer needs. Organizations that regularly evaluate and adapt their training modules ensure continuous improvement in service quality, which translates into increased customer retention and higher revenue margins.

Key Learning 2: Quantifying the Financial Impact of Training for Strategic Decision-Making

The second crucial learning is the importance of analyzing training benefits in terms of tangible financial outcomes, such as reduced costs and increased revenues. The case underscores that organizations can measure the effectiveness of training initiatives by estimating the financial impact through metrics such as reduced operational costs and increased sales.

A practical example provided in the case relates to calculating the increased revenue attributable to improved customer satisfaction. For instance, with an assumption of a $500 monthly revenue per customer and a customer base of 500, the 10% reduction in 'Very Dissatisfied — Will Never Return' customers can lead to substantial revenue gains over six months. Specifically, the decreased dissatisfaction translates into retaining more customers, which leads to increased revenue—estimated at $125,000 over six months for 500 customers, and $250,000 for 1,000 customers. Such calculations provide compelling evidence to justify training investments, framing them as strategic moves that positively influence the bottom line.

In addition to revenue increases, the case underscores the importance of cost savings derived from training. Reductions in employee overtime costs, fewer returns due to improved quality, and decreased safety incidents are quantifiable examples. Assuming a 10% reduction in direct costs such as overtime, returns, and damages, organizations can directly link training initiatives to cost-efficiency gains. Furthermore, reducing employee turnover through enhanced job satisfaction and engagement—estimated at a 10% decrease—can lead to significant savings. If the cost of employee turnover is 1.5 times the salary, then reducing turnover results in notable financial benefits, especially in labor-intensive sectors.

Scholarly research emphasizes that organizations employing a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of training initiatives are better positioned to allocate resources efficiently. For example, Bartel (1994) suggests that firms that quantify the return on training investment are more effective in aligning training programs with strategic priorities, ensuring sustainability, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement.

Integrating Training with Organizational Strategy

Effectively embedding training within the strategic fabric of an organization requires systematic assessment and continuous adaptation. Training must be aligned with organizational goals, customer expectations, and operational needs to maximize its impact. Moreover, measuring training outcomes in financial terms—such as increases in revenue and reductions in costs—facilitates strategic decision-making and justifies investments.

Implementing feedback loops, regular training evaluations, and performance metrics ensures that training remains relevant and effective. For instance, adopting a data-driven approach as advocated by Noe (2017) enhances the ability of organizations to adapt training programs dynamically, addressing emerging business challenges and opportunities. Additionally, fostering a culture that values learning and development encourages employees to continually upgrade their skills, which is vital in rapidly changing markets.

Ultimately, these key learnings underscore that a strategic approach to training and development—focused on targeted skill enhancement and rigorous evaluation of financial impacts—can significantly boost organizational performance. By integrating training into the core strategic processes, organizations can ensure that their human capital remains a competitive advantage, capable of meeting customer needs and driving sustainable growth.

References

• Bartel, J. (1994). 'Recruiting and training skill: Impact on productivity and wages.' Journal of Human Resources, 29(4), 778–806.
• Bowen, D. E., & Ford, R. C. (2000). 'Managing Service Quality: Strategies and Tools.' Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 115–130.
• Heskett, J. L., Sasser, W. E., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1994). 'Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work.' Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 164–174.
• Leibowitz, S. (2019). 'Strategic Human Resource Development: Integrating Training and Organizational Goals.' International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(14), 2204–2220.
• Noe, R. A. (2017). Employee Training and Development. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Richards, D., & Jones, S. (2018). 'Measuring the ROI of Training and Development.' Journal of Business Strategy, 39(3), 45–52.
• Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. (2012). 'The Science of Training and Development in Organizations.' Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 471–499.
• Welch, M., & Welch, J. (2017). 'Connecting Employee and Organizational Learning to Business Results.' Organizational Dynamics, 46(1), 24–32.
• Youndt, M. A., & Snell, S. A. (2004). 'Intangible Resources, Strategic Alignment, and Organizational Performance.' Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 45–54.
• Zairi, M. (1998). 'Measuring Organizational Performance for Business Process Management.' Business Process Management Journal, 4(3), 217–229.