This Is My Feedback... You Correctly Solved Almost All

This is my feed back You correctly solved almost all

This is my feed back... You correctly solved almost all

This assignment involves evaluating your statistical calculations and explanations related to confidence intervals and sample size determination. The feedback indicates that most of your work demonstrates a proficient understanding of the concepts, with correct terminology and detailed steps. It emphasizes the importance of explicitly showing how critical values are obtained during confidence interval calculations, whether using Excel, tables, or external sources, and properly citing these methods. Regarding specific calculations, all confidence interval work was good, but your description of the steps needs to be more thorough in your Word document. Additionally, your work on question 5 was incorrect; there is a specific formula for computing the minimum sample size that you need to apply using the information provided in the problem to find the correct answer. You mentioned having the answers but needing the correct ones inserted where errors occurred.

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding the importance of confidence intervals in statistics is fundamental for accurately estimating population parameters. Confidence intervals provide a range within which we expect a population parameter, such as a mean or proportion, to lie with a certain level of confidence. The process of constructing these intervals involves several key steps, including calculating sample statistics, selecting the appropriate critical value, and expressing the margin of error. Typical tools for these calculations include statistical software like Excel, which simplifies the process, or statistical tables and external sources that require proper citation when used.

In this context, my initial work demonstrated a solid grasp of these concepts, as the confidence interval calculations were mostly accurate and well-explained. The use of correct terminology such as "standard error," "critical value," "margin of error," and "confidence level" was consistent throughout the document. Furthermore, the detailed steps I provided explained how the sample statistic was obtained, how the critical value was determined, and how the margin of error was computed, emphasizing transparency and reproducibility of the process.

To enhance the quality of my explanation, I recognize the necessity of explicitly showing how I derived the critical values. For example, when constructing a confidence interval for a population mean with a known or unknown standard deviation, I should demonstrate whether I used the Z-distribution or the t-distribution. When using Excel, functions such as CONFIDENCE.NORM or CONFIDENCE.T can be employed, and it is essential to cite these functions appropriately. If consulting tables or external sources, their origins must be cited according to academic standards.

Regarding the confidence interval calculations themselves, I correctly identified the sample mean, standard deviation, and sample size, then calculated the standard error and margin of error. These results contribute to the final interval, which I reported in my work. The key improvement is to restate the detailed steps in finding each component, making the process more transparent for the reader and ensuring full clarity in my methodology.

Particularly, question 5 posed a challenge because it required calculating the minimum sample size for a specific confidence level and margin of error. A common mistake made was applying an incorrect formula or misinterpreting the problem data. The standard formula for minimum sample size for estimating a mean when the population standard deviation is known is:

n = (Zα/2 * σ / E)2

This formula involves the critical value (Zα/2), the population standard deviation (σ), and the desired margin of error (E). To obtain the correct minimum sample size, I must identify the correct Z-value for the specified confidence level, ensure the standard deviation value is accurately used or estimated, and correctly input the margin of error from the problem. By recomputing using this formula, I can determine the proper sample size, rather than relying on incorrect assumptions or calculations.

In summary, my work demonstrates a strong overall understanding of confidence interval concepts and calculations. To improve, I will explicitly show the steps in deriving critical values, properly cite sources for any external tools or tables used, and double-check calculations, especially in scenarios requiring sample size determination. Applying the correct formula and carefully interpreting the problem data will ensure accuracy and completeness in my solutions.

References

  • Montgomery, D. C., & Runger, G. C. (2014). Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers (6th ed.). Wiley.
  • Newbold, P., Carlson, W. L., & Thorne, B. (2013). Statistics for Business and Economics (8th ed.). Pearson.
  • Devore, J. L., & Peck, R. (2018). Statistics: The Exploration and Analysis of Data (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2018). Confidence intervals and sample size calculations. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov
  • Statistics Canada. (2019). Confidence intervals and sampling theory. Retrieved from https://www.statcan.gc.ca
  • Microsoft Support. (2020). Use confidence functions in Excel. Retrieved from https://support.microsoft.com
  • Laerd Statistics. (2017). How to calculate and interpret confidence intervals. Retrieved from https://statistics.laerd.com
  • Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1994). Diagnostic tests: Likelihood ratios. BMJ, 309(6948), 497.
  • Walpole, R. E., Myers, R. H., Myers, S. L., & Ye, K. (2012). Probability & Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences (9th ed.). Pearson.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.

Related Assignments